Who holds the burden of proof to demonstrate that Miranda rights were provided correctly at trial?

In the context of Miranda rights, the burden of proof lies with the State to demonstrate that the Miranda warnings were provided in accordance with legal requirements. This obligation is crucial because it ensures that any statements obtained during interrogation are admissible in court. The State must show that the defendant was informed of their rights—specifically the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney—before questioning took place. If the State fails to meet this burden, any statements made by the defendant during interrogation may be excluded from evidence, affecting the prosecution's case profoundly. This principle is rooted in the Fifth Amendment, which protects individuals from self-incrimination, and the procedural safeguards established in Miranda v. Arizona.