Which of the following can be an example of exigent circumstances?

Study for the Police Academy – Constitutional Law Test. Enhance your knowledge with flashcards and multiple-choice questions, each with hints and explanations. Gear up for your exam success!

Exigent circumstances refer to situations that require immediate action and override the normal requirement of obtaining a search warrant. In this context, immediate harm to a person or destruction of evidence encompasses scenarios where delaying action could lead to serious consequences, such as injury to a person or the loss of crucial evidence. For example, if law enforcement is informed about a person in distress or hears noises indicating violence or serious criminal activity, they are justified in entering a property without a warrant to prevent further harm or to secure evidence that could be destroyed if they waited to obtain a warrant.

The other scenarios do not meet the threshold for exigent circumstances. Suspecting a minor theft does not typically constitute an urgent situation requiring immediate intervention. A tip-off about a potential crime, while concerning, does not entail an immediate need for action that would justify bypassing the warrant process. Lastly, the long-term surveillance of a suspect is generally a methodical approach to gathering evidence, which does not create the pressing urgency associated with exigent circumstances.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy