What approach should be avoided when reading Miranda rights to a suspect?

The approach that should be avoided when reading Miranda rights to a suspect is changing the wording. This is critical because Miranda rights, established by the Supreme Court in the case of Miranda v. Arizona, are specific statements that must be conveyed to a suspect in order for them to understand their rights fully. The exact wording is designed to ensure that the suspect comprehends that they have the right to remain silent and that anything they say can be used against them in court.

Altering the language can lead to misunderstandings or confusion about these rights, which may ultimately affect the admissibility of any statements made by the suspect during police interrogation. Consistent and precise wording helps uphold the integrity of the legal process and protects the rights of individuals within the judicial system.

In contrast, providing a detailed explanation, using a clear voice, and ensuring language comprehension are all recommended practices that aid in effectively communicating these important rights to suspects.